33 percent of Lok Sabha by 2026 Uttar Pradesh+Bihar+West Bengal (Special to IANS)

From 29 percent today, 33 percent members of the Lok Sabha will come from three states – Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and West Bengal – within a decade, according to an IndiaSpend analysis of data in a Kotak Securities report on the demographic dividend of India’s Gangetic belt.

Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and West Bengal are the states identified as part of the Gangetic belt. Accounting for half of India’s population, these states have fertility rates higher than the Indian average. On an average, Bihari women of child-bearing age have 3.4 children each and women in UP have 3.1. The average for the Indian woman is 2.3 children.

If India’s parliamentary seats were to be re-allocated across states on the basis of population, the Gangetic belt would send 275 of 548 MPs to the Lok Sabha, according to estimates.

India’s constitution has fixed the number of MPs per state, based on the 1971 census, although it allows periodic delimitation exercises – changing constituency boundaries to adjust for population growth so that each Lok Sabha MP represents a fairly equal number of people. States that had lower birth rates wanted to protect their political say at the Centre, and so, the numbers of MPs per state have been frozen for the last 45 years.

The constitution currently requires that this arrangement be looked at again post 2026, the Kotak report said.

The Gangetic belt represents three of India’s largest four states in terms of population – Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and West Bengal. These three states are home to a third of India’s population: 394 million of 1.2 billion.

Maharashtra is India’s second-most populous state, with 112 million people, followed by Bihar and West Bengal.

Why state elections are important to the BJP

Bihar held its assembly elections about six months ago in October-November 2015. The ruling Janata Dal-United was returned with the help of a Mahagatbandhan (grand alliance) with the Rashtriya Janata Dal and the Congress after swinging pre-poll predictions, IndiaSpend reported earlier.

Another state in the Gangetic belt, West Bengal, will vote in the sixth and the last phase on Thursday. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) at the Centre has only two Lok Sabha seats from West Bengal and no seats in the state assembly.

The Uttar Pradesh elections are scheduled in 2017. While the BJP swept the national elections in 2014 by winning 71 of the state’s 80 Lok Sabha seats, the party sends only three members to the Rajya Sabha from the state.

Laws cannot be passed without the approval of both houses of parliament and the lack of majority in the Rajya Sabha is hurting the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance.

With the loss of the Bihar assembly elections, the BJP lost a chance to be better represented in the Rajya Sabha, IndiaSpend reported earlier.

Does the Gangetic belt need more MPs?

India has one MP in the Lok Sabha for 2.2 million people. For comparison, the US, the third most populated country, has one Congressman for 0.6 million people. And each MP in the UK (a much smaller country of 64 million people, or about the same as Karnataka) represents 0.1 million people.

An MP from the Gangetic belt represents about 25 percent more people than a non-Gangetic MP, according to the Kotak report.

Rajasthan has the highest proportion (2.7 million) of people represented by each MP, followed by Bihar (2.6 million), and UP and MP at 2.5 million each, which is also the average of the Gangetic belt.

With high fertility rates, the proportion of people represented per MP is estimated to rise in the Gangetic belt to 2.9 million by 2026, when the next delimitation of parliamentary seats is due.

(In arrangement with IndiaSpend.org, a data-driven, non-profit, public interest journalism platform, where Saumya Tewari is a policy analyst; additional research by Devanik Saha. The views expressed are those of India Spend. The author can be contacted at respond@indiaspend.org)



Related Posts

Leave a Reply