New Delhi, April 28 (IANS) The Delhi High Court on Tuesday sought response from the Central government, the UGC and JNU on a plea challenging the UGC notification that put a cap on number of M.Phil and Ph.D research scholars a professor can guide.
A division bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice Anu Malhotra asked the government, University Grants Commission and Jawaharlal Nehru University to file their response on the plea and posted the matter for hearing on May 11.
The plea filed by the Students’ Federation of India (SFI) and some aspiring M.Phil and Ph.D students of JNU and Delhi University challenged the constitutional validity of the UGC (Minimum Standards and Procedure for Award of M.Phil and Ph.D degree) Regulations 2016 which came into effect from July 5, 2016.
They have contended that the UGC notification “threatens to put their future in jeopardy” as they would not be able to find research supervisors/guides due to the said notification.
The SFI and students argued that the notification’s ramifications will extend beyond existing researchers and lead to few admissions of research aspirants in the current academic session.
Compared to 970 seats in the last academic year for these two degrees, this year the number of seats in JNU has dropped to 102 due to capping of the number of students per research supervisor for M.Phil and Ph.D courses, said the plea.
The admission regulations were contrary to the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles of State Policy, said the plea terming regulations as “irrational, unreasonable and arbitrary”.
The petition further argued that the cap was put without consulting or informing students and without improving infrastructure.
It also challenged various provisions of the regulations including those laying down a minimum percentage requirement of 55 per cent for general category and 50 per cent for reserved category as well as the 100 per cent weightage given to viva-voce exam.