Washington D.C, Mar 4 (ANI): Many studies have highlighted that underemployed people experience lower objective career success and lower subjective career success, but little is known about the lasting effects of taking a job below one’s skill level.
To make ends meet in the short term, many workers may accept part-time positions, seek work from temporary agencies or take jobs below their skill level, but a University of Texas study revealed that accepting a job as such can be severely penalizing when applying for future employment because of the perception that someone who does this is less committed or less competent.
Researcher David Pedulla said that even though millions of workers are employed in part-time positions, through temporary agencies and at jobs below their skill level, less attention has been paid to how these types of employment situations influence workers’ future hiring outcomes.
Pedulla submitted 2,420 fictitious applications for 1,210 real job openings in five cities across the United States and tracked employers’ responses to each application. All applicant information was held constant, including six years of prior work experience, except for gender and applicants’ employment situation during the previous year. Job histories involved full-time work, part-time work, a temporary help agency position, a job below the applicant’s skill level (“skills underutilization”), or unemployment.
The study found that about 5 percent of men and women working below their skill level received a “callback” or positive employer response; about half the callback rate for workers in full-time jobs at their skill level. Similarly, less than 5 percent of men working part time received callbacks. However, part-time employment had no negative effect for women, and temporary agency employment had little effect for either gender.
The study offers compelling evidence that taking a job below one’s skill level is quite penalizing, regardless of one’s gender. Additionally, part-time work severely hurts the job prospects of men, Pedulla noted, adding that these findings raise important additional questions about why employers are less likely to hire workers with these employment histories.
The study appears online in the American Sociological Review. (ANI)