India’s biggest reform to transform the life of a crisis-ridden farmer is 91.6 percent behind schedule this year, prompting Prime Minister Narendra Modi to promise in five months what could not be done over the last 10.
As many as 250 agricultural markets nationwide (of 585 selected) were supposed to have been linked by 2015-16 to a common nationwide electronic platform, but only 21 markets in eights states have been linked-as of March 2016-to what is called the National Agricultural Market (NAM) platform.
On average, a farmer gets no more than 10 percent to 30 percent of the cost you pay for his produce, as IndiaSpend has reported, primarily because the farmer cannot sell directly to consumers and large companies, thanks to an archaic law that delivers commissions to layers of agents, usually linked to politicians.
Despite the slow progress, the target of linking 585 markets to the NAM by 2018 stays unchanged, according to a statement issued on April 14, 2016, by the Ministry of Agriculture. This means that 564 markets must be linked in two years, 26 times the number (21) linked over the last 10 months.
Last week Prime Minister Narendra Modi promised to link 200 markets over the next five months.
The NAM platform will allow anyone from any part of India to buy agricultural produce from any farmer from any part of the country.
There are 2,477 principal agricultural markets and 4,843 sub-markets (smaller than principal markets) that buy and sell agricultural produce in India.
The NAM target of 585 thus covers only 25 percent of the India’s principal agricultural markets.
The law that helps agents and politicians
The Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) Act of a state regulates the purchase of agricultural products, such as cereals, pulses, fruits and vegetables for that region.
It hobbles farmers, imposing multiple levies on produce and disallows direct sales to private companies.
“The continued presence of regulations of APMC Acts in most commodities in most states has compelled the farmer to sell produce only in the government-controlled marketing yards,” said a December 2015 NITI Aayog report, Raising Agricultural Productivity and Making Farming Remunerative for Farmers. “The APMC market yards are subject to vast technical as well as marketing inefficiencies that undermine the prices that farmers receive.”
Bihar is the only state to have repealed the APMC Act in 2006. Kerala never enacted APMC legislation, but it did not develop marketing infrastructure either.
“APMCs levy multiple fees, of substantial magnitude, that are non-transparent and hence a source of political power,” said the Economic Survey of 2015-16 (Volume 1, Chapter 8).
For instance, at the principal market yard for Mumbai city (at Vashi), farmers must pay two percent commission to agents, who charge further commissions that range from 6.5 percent (on onions) to 10 percent (on vegetables), the survey said.
The southern state of Karnataka has pioneered modern agriculture marketing by unifying 51 of 155 principal markets statewide in collaboration with the National Commodity Exchange, a trading platform for commodities.
(In arrangement with IndiaSpend.org, a data-driven, non-profit, public interest journalism platform, with which Abhishek Waghmare is an analyst. The views expressed are those of IndiaSpend. The author can be contacted at firstname.lastname@example.org)